What Is Sanatana? ‘Sat,’ ‘Truth,’ and Eternity
‘Sat,’ ‘Truth,’ and Eternity
Today, the word “Sanatana” is used in a wide variety of senses. Sometimes it refers to the Indian religious tradition, sometimes it is treated as a synonym for Vedic culture, and sometimes it is used directly in the sense of the “Supreme Truth.”
In this regard, various questions arise in the minds of seekers and Sundarsath, and the subject is discussed repeatedly. Therefore, rather than refuting or supporting any particular viewpoint, this is a modest attempt to understand and clarify the meanings of Sat, Truth, and Sanatana from the perspective of Tartam Vani.
The fundamental question is: What is Sanatana in reality—is it an ancient tradition, a scripture, the knowledge expressed in that scripture, or the eternal Sat to which all these point?
Sanatana—Not Merely Ancient, but Eternal
The general meaning of “Sanatana” is eternal, everlasting, enduring, and existing from beginningless time. Being very old and being Sanatana are not the same thing. A tradition may have continued for thousands of years and may therefore be extremely ancient; but in the spiritual sense, “Sanatana” points to that reality whose essential existence does not depend on changes in time, place, or circumstances.
Therefore, the true criterion of Sanatana is not merely how old an idea is, but what it contains that does not lose its essential reality even beyond the changes of time and creation.
Sat—That Which Truly Is
The fundamental meaning of Sat is that which truly exists, that which possesses real being. Thus, Sat is not merely the name of an opinion, belief, or correct statement; it points to reality itself.
The world around us is constantly changing. The body changes, circumstances change, thoughts and cultures change, and our understanding also continues to change. Spiritual inquiry is the search, amid this changing nature, for that foundation which does not depend merely on our imagination or belief.
Here the relationship between Sat, Truth, and Sanatana becomes clear:
Sat — the reality that truly exists.
Truth — the accurate understanding, experience, and expression of that Sat.
Sanatana — the eternal, imperishable, and timeless existence of that Sat.
Our understanding of truth may develop, but Sat does not come into being or cease to be according to our understanding.
Sat in Tartam Vani—The Living Reality of Paramdham
In Tartam Vani, Sat is not merely an abstract philosophical concept. The Vani contains many expressions such as Sat Sagar, Sat Dhani, Sat Sath, Sat Dham, Sat Khasam, Sat Noor, Sat Sang, Sat Ras, Sat Sukh, Sat Anand, Sat Vilas, Sat Shringar, Sat Vichar, Sat Sai, and Sat Rang. These expressions broaden and deepen the meaning of Sat.
Here, Sat does not mean merely a “correct statement.” It points to eternal reality and to the Dhani, Dham, Noor, soul-relationship, love, rasa, bliss, and divine play present within that reality.
Thus, the Sat of Tartam Vani is not merely a question of existence—“What is eternal?”—but also reveals the nature of that eternal reality. It is not merely an attributeless void or an inactive eternity; it is the loving and blissful reality of Paramdham.
Sat Dhani points to the eternal Beloved.
Sat Dham points to the eternal original home.
Sat Noor points to the eternal light.
Sat Sath points to the eternal soul-relationship.
Sat Ras and Sat Rang point to the experience of love within that relationship.
Sat Sukh and Sat Anand point to its uninterrupted blissful nature.
Sat Vilas and Sat Shringar point to the eternal loving play of Paramdham.
Thus, to understand Sat merely as an inert metaphysical “existence” does not capture the full expression of Tartam Vani. Here, Sat is existence as well as relationship; light as well as love; abode as well as bliss; and eternal divine play as well.
That is why the relationship between Sat and Sanatana is so profound. The true Sat is not bound by the changing nature of time, and that which is eternal in this way is Sanatana in the true sense.
What Existed Before Creation?
The question now becomes deeper. If a reality, principle, or state has manifested at some point, can it alone be called the Supreme Sanatana? What existed before it?
Tartam Vani takes this inquiry far beyond the beginning of creation:
Na Isvar na mool prakriti, ta din ki kahun aapa biti.
Nij lila Brahm bal charitra, jaki ichchha mool prakrit।।
Here, the Vani points to a stage in which even the cosmic form of Ishvara and primordial Prakriti had not yet manifested. The play of Akshar Brahman is explained through the metaphor of a child’s play—the manifestation and dissolution of universes take place within that play, and the desire for creation is referred to as primordial Prakriti.
This leads to an important discernment: that which manifests at a particular stage of creation cannot be regarded as identical with the original eternal reality that exists even before its manifestation.
The Vani further says:
Ab suniyo mool vachan prakar, jab nahin upajyo moh ahankar.
Nahin nirakar nahin sunya, na nirgun na niranjan।।
Here, the Vani points to the original state in which delusion and ego had not yet arisen; nor had the states referred to as the formless, the void, the attributeless, and Niranjan manifested.
The implication is highly significant: the spiritual journey does not end merely upon reaching the formless from the visible world. If the formless, the void, the attributeless, and Niranjan are also indicators of particular levels or states, then the search for Sanatana must proceed beyond them toward the eternal Sat.
Before the Five Elements and the Manifestation of Conscious Light
Jal jimi na tej vae, na soham sabad akas।
Tab e adi anadi ki, jab nahin chetan prakas।।
This points to a state in which even the five elements—earth, water, fire, air, and space—had not yet manifested; the meaning expressed by the sound “Soham” was not present, and the cosmic manifestation of conscious light had not yet appeared.
In other words, the Vani speaks of a state prior even to everything that appears to us today as the world, nature, the elements, and the manifested forms of consciousness. Therefore, it is not sufficient to seek Sanatana only within the present cosmic order; the inquiry must reach its original foundation.
The Original Non-Duality—Where Sat Is Also Love and Bliss
Here, the true significance of Sat Dhani, Sat Dham, Sat Sath, Sat Ras, and Sat Anand, described earlier, becomes even clearer. The Vani does not bring this inquiry to a vacant void; rather, it leads toward the original realm of supreme love:
Pahale mool advait men, bhom jahan isk।
Tahan prem rabad men, bhaya hukam hak ।।
Here, “Original Non-Duality” points to the supreme realm whose very foundation is ishq—love. Therefore, the Sat of Paramdham is not merely eternal existence; it is eternal existence filled with love.
Here, the various expressions of Sat in Tartam Vani come together as one: there is Sat Dhani, Sat Dham, Sat Noor, Sat Sath, Sat relationship, Sat Ras, Sat Rang, Sat Sukh, and Sat Anand.
Thus, ultimate reality is not limited to the awareness “I am.” There, the questions “Whom do I belong to? Where is my original home? Who is my Beloved? What is my eternal relationship?” become equally central.
For this reason, the Sat of Paramdham is not merely ontological reality—“existence”—but also relational reality—“eternal relationship.” The nature of that relationship is love, rasa, and bliss.
Partial Truth and Complete Truth
An important discernment is necessary here. A truth at one level does not become false merely because a more comprehensive truth exists beyond it. However, mistaking a partial truth for the complete truth can be an error.
The visible world is experiential truth at its own level; the realization of the formless may be subtler than it; the reality of Akshar may be more expansive still. Yet if the Vani points beyond Akshar toward Aksharatit and Paramdham, then a seeker cannot declare an intermediate state to be the final reality.
Therefore, the question is not merely, “Is it right or wrong?” It is also: How much truth does it contain? At what level is it true? What are its limits? And what lies beyond it?
Scriptures and Eternal Truth
The Vedas, Upanishads, Kateb, and other great spiritual scriptures offer humanity important indications of truth. They are worthy of respect because they lift human beings beyond limited experience and guide them toward a more expansive reality.
However, there is a difference between the light of eternal truth being present in a scripture and limiting eternal truth exclusively to that scripture. The reality to which a scripture points is greater than the words of the scripture itself. A map may be accurate and extremely useful, but the map itself is not the destination.
Sanatana Dharma—Not Merely a Name, but a Direction for Life
If Sanatana Truth is the eternal reality whose essential existence is independent of our acceptance or rejection, then, in the broader spiritual sense, Sanatana Dharma is the path of recognizing that eternal Sat and living in accordance with it.
Thus, Sanatana is not merely a matter of a religious name, historical identity, or the superiority of one tradition. Its true test lies in life: Are our words, actions, and conduct moving closer to truth? Is love increasing? Is ego diminishing? Are discernment and compassion growing together? Has knowledge remained merely information, or is it transforming life?
Ultimately, the fruit of scripture is not simply to know more, but to awaken and live in accordance with that truth.
In Conclusion—The Relationship Between Sanatana and Tartam Vani
Sanatana does not mean merely “very ancient”; it is the eternal Sat whose essential existence is not destroyed by the changes of time and creation. Tartam Vani makes this Sat living and tangible—not merely as an abstract reality, but as Sat Dhani, Sat Dham, Sat Noor, Sat Sath, Sat Ras, Sat Rang, Sat Sukh, and Sat Anand. It does not consider the journey complete upon reaching the visible world, the formless, or the void; rather, it reveals Akshar and Aksharatit beyond them.
In this vision, Paramdham is not merely eternal “existence,” but the realm of eternal love, relationship, rasa, bliss, and divine play. Scriptures point toward that Sat; Tartam provides discernment regarding the levels and limits of those indications. Jagni is not merely knowing that Sat intellectually, but awakening to one’s original Dham, Dhani, and eternal relationship.
That which is merely ancient is not necessarily Sanatana.
That which truly is Sat and remains Sat beyond time—that alone is Sanatana.
And in Tartam Vani, this Sat is not merely eternal existence; it is also the eternal Dham, the eternal Dhani, eternal love, eternal relationship, and eternal bliss.
May you always remain in eternal bliss and auspiciousness.
Tampa, September 22, 2026
Narendra Patel
(This is the second edition of the earlier article.)
Comments
Post a Comment